We really value focus, clarity, and conciseness. What advice do you have for authors preparing their first short paper for submission to AERI? As with everything in economics (and life), there are trade-offs. Of course, it has the disadvantage that we sometimes have to reject papers that might well succeed under a more traditional "revise and resubmit" system. This policy has the advantage of dramatically reducing the time cost on authors of a revision, and we see that as very valuable. conditional accept) to final editorial acceptance has been less than nine weeks. Indeed, median time from first response (i.e. And we are able to make decisions quickly based on what they return. To self-enforce the norm that all requests must be doable in a relatively short time, we ask for revisions back from the authors within eight weeks. The editor's requests are limited to expositional changes only, and we do not send the revised paper back to referees. You have a unique policy of not having "revise and resubmits." Why?Ī major-and deliberate-policy difference between ourselves and most economics journals is that we do not do traditional "revise and resubmits." First responses will be either a reject or "conditional accept." In order to conditionally accept a paper, we must have no uncertainty about the feasibility of our requested changes (e.g., can the proof be generalized? Is the empirical result robust to X?). In 2019, of papers sent to review, the median decision time was 45 days, and the 90 th percentile was 73 days only one paper had a decision time longer than 90 days (and it took 91 days). We desk reject roughly 45% of submissions for a number of different reasons, including expected probability of meeting the standards of the journal, breadth of topic, excessive reliance on online appendices, and interest to the AERI audience. Our conflict of interest rules are listed on our webpage. Once assigned, papers are handled by the designated coeditor throughout the decision process, without review by the editor. Papers are assigned on the basis of field of expertise of the coeditor. Papers are submitted online and then distributed by the editor to one of the coeditors or to herself for refereeing and a publication decision. (They say a picture is worth a thousand words, but at AERI we've decided it's worth 200.) Thus a paper with no exhibits must have less than or equal to 7,000 words.Ĭould you please tell us about the process a little bit from submission to decision? (Really, it is easy!) Manuscripts must be less than or equal to 6,000 words (not counting references) with a maximum of five exhibits for each exhibit before the maximum five, authors may add up to 200 words toward the word limit. Our length limit is based on the number of words, and we have a word counter linked on our submission page to make it easy to check if you comply. If your paper has lots of moving parts, or you have a striking result but it requires a long discussion to establish or contextualize it, it's probably better to send it elsewhere. Send us your brilliant short papers, please!Ī great short paper makes one point and makes it clearly, concisely, and effectively. But we focus on those papers with important insights that can be conveyed succinctly. We're a top-tier general interest economics journal, publishing papers of the same quality and importance as those in the AER. What kind of papers are you looking for at AER: Insights ? The American Economic Review: Insights is about to mark its first anniversary in publication.Īs AER: Insights approaches its first anniversary, its founding editor, Amy Finkelstein, answers some questions about the journal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |